Made-in-China.com · supplier assessment · quote revisions · STS orders

Made-in-China: supplier reports and orders

Separate Made-in-China.com supplier reports from product certificates, quote revisions and secured-order events; compare MOQ and delivery terms on the same basis.

Separate supplier assessment from product and order evidence

Made-in-China.com describes its Audited Supplier reports at the supplier level and says the process includes on-site verification. That describes the scope of the report; it does not make the report a certificate for a particular model, an inspection result for a shipment lot, or evidence of the terms accepted in an STS order. Keep each evidence record at its own grain.

Scroll to compare →

Separate supplier assessment from product and order evidence
Record grainBuyer-held fieldsWhat it can answer
Audited Supplier reportSupplier entity/site reference; report issuer; report version/date; stated scope; findings or follow-up referenceWhat the particular supplier assessment says about its stated subject and scope.
Product certificateIssuer; standard or regulation; exact model/material; certificate identifier; validity and covered marketWhether the certificate identifies the product and scope being evaluated.
Lot inspectionBuyer order/lot reference; sampled quantity; method; inspection date; result and limitationsWhat was inspected for the identified lot or sample; not every later production run.
STS orderBuyer transaction reference; order-start type; accepted quote revision; agreed specification, quantity and terms; dated event referencesWhat the parties recorded for one order and its own payment, shipment, receipt or issue events.

Preserve the three STS order starts

The current Made-in-China.com Buyer’s Guide distinguishes three Secured Trading Service order starts by who initiates the record. These labels help explain why a buyer-owned quote trail may begin differently; they do not replace the accepted order terms or the event documents for a transaction.

Scroll to compare →

Preserve the three STS order starts
Guide’s order typeGuide’s described starting pointBuyer-owned record to connect
Negotiated OrderBuyer-initiated; the guide describes supplier quotation and negotiation before payment.Request reference, each dated quote revision, accepted revision and resulting order reference.
Rush OrderBuyer-initiated fixed order; the guide says it can proceed to payment without supplier negotiation.Fixed specification and quantity, displayed terms as retained by the buyer, acceptance/payment evidence and later events.
Supplier Drafted OrderThe guide describes an order created by the supplier for the buyer to review through the buyer’s account.Buyer-controlled order reference, reviewed terms, acceptance evidence and subsequent payment/shipment events; exclude account credentials and personal contact fields.

Follow a hypothetical buyer-owned quote into an order

Hypothetical buyer-owned example: the references and quantities below are hypothetical buyer records, not MIC listings, live orders, or retrieved output. The useful join is the quote revision accepted into one order, followed by dated evidence about that order.

Scroll to compare →

Follow a hypothetical buyer-owned quote into an order
Hypothetical eventBuyer-owned fields to preserveKeep it separate from
Request REQ-17 asks for 480 unitsBuyer specification R1; unit; required market/destination; requested quantity; buyer record dateAny supplier listing, profile or contact record.
Quote Q-17 revision A states MOQ 500Quote revision; MOQ and tier; quantity basis; currency/unit; issue and expiry dates; configuration; stated delivery basisA confirmed order or a price for a different configuration.
Buyer requests revision B and accepts 500 unitsChanged specification fields; revision date; approval role; accepted revision; buyer order reference ORD-17The superseded quote or an unaccepted draft.
Inspection, dispatch and receipt are recordedOrder/lot link; sample scope and result; dispatch document/date; quantity shipped and received; event source/dateThe supplier assessment or an unlabeled order status.
A hypothetical receipt issue is openedIssue date; affected quantity; evidence reference; agreed response and closure dateA general claim about protection, refund eligibility or transaction outcome.

Compare MOQ and delivery terms on the same basis

A unit amount is not comparable by itself. Match the requested configuration, quantity tier, unit, currency and validity first. When an Incoterms® rule is used, retain the rule, edition and named place; record freight, insurance, duties, packaging, customization and other charges separately when the quote does not include them. The ICC overview supplies trade-term context; the actual quote and contract remain the transaction records.

Scroll to compare →

Compare MOQ and delivery terms on the same basis
Comparison checkRecord with each buyer quoteWhy it matters
MOQ and quantity tierMinimum, quoted tier, requested quantity and unitA quote for a different quantity tier may have a different basis even when it describes the same specification.
Configuration and revisionBuyer specification/version; material, dimensions, packaging or customization fields relevant to the requestThe accepted order must point to the revision that was actually approved.
Price basisCurrency; per-piece, per-set or other unit; included and excluded charges; issue/expiry datesNormalizing only the displayed unit amount can omit material charges or compare expired terms.
Delivery basisIncoterms® rule and edition; exact named place; destination; separately billed freight/insurance/dutiesThe named rule and place shape the quote’s cost and delivery allocation; they are not interchangeable labels.
Order connectionOrder type; quote revision accepted; order reference and acceptance dateThe MIC guide’s different order starts do not remove the need to retain the buyer’s agreed terms.

Separate MIC source documents from buyer event fields

The buyer-owned example tracks quote and order references without turning account, contact or service-use data into procurement fields.

Scroll to compare →

Separate MIC source documents from buyer event fields
EvidenceVersion or date shownScope described on the source page
Buyer User AgreementBuyers Version updated 14 October 2025; effective 21 October 2025§II.3(5) addresses collecting other users’ information, including email addresses and user IDs, without prior consent of MIC and those users. §II.3(7) lists copying, translation and reverse-engineering acts involving MIC. §V.3 identifies MIC-published and compiled content and states restrictions on copying, citing, linking or other use without Focus Tech’s written consent, except as mandatorily provided by law.
Buyer Privacy PolicyBuyers Version updated 3 September 2026; effective 10 September 2026Distinguishes personal information actively provided for product or service functions from information about service use, including service logs. The example leaves account identifiers, contact details, messages and activity logs out of the buyer-owned event model.

Content reviewed 2026-10-07.